# midgard vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | midgard | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 15 in Productivity | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 230 | 45 007 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 634 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 27 Sept 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 48/100 for midgard, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for midgard.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; midgard needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 634 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [midgard](https://selfhost.directory/project/midgard) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/midgard.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/midgard-vs-reactive-resume