# MeTube vs unraid-config-guardian

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MeTube | unraid-config-guardian |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 45 in Download Management | #38 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 15 131 ✓ | 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +288 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 48 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.27 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.6.1 · 16 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MeTube scores 76/100 against 46/100 for unraid-config-guardian, so it is the safer default.

MeTube ships more often: 48 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unraid-config-guardian.

If you want the quickest setup, MeTube is easier to run; unraid-config-guardian needs more configuration.

MeTube is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MeTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/metube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metube.md)
- [unraid-config-guardian](https://selfhost.directory/project/unraid-config-guardian) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unraid-config-guardian.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metube-vs-unraid-config-guardian