# MeTube vs transcriber

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MeTube | transcriber |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 45 in Download Management | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 15 128 ✓ | 153 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +285 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 48 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.27 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MeTube scores 76/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.

MeTube ships more often: 48 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.

If you want the quickest setup, MeTube is easier to run; transcriber needs more configuration.

MeTube is growing faster right now (+285 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MeTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/metube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metube.md)
- [transcriber](https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metube-vs-transcriber