# MeTube vs SyncWatch同步观影

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MeTube | SyncWatch同步观影 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 45 in Download Management | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 15 126 ✓ | 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +289 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 48 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.27 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

MeTube scores 76/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

MeTube ships more often: 48 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for SyncWatch同步观影.

If you want the quickest setup, MeTube is easier to run; SyncWatch同步观影 needs more configuration.

MeTube is growing faster right now (+289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MeTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/metube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metube.md)
- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metube-vs-syncwatch