# MeTube vs subarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MeTube | subarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 45 in Download Management | #79 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 126 ✓ | 147 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +289 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 48 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.27 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.7.24 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MeTube scores 76/100 against 48/100 for subarr, so it is the safer default.

MeTube ships more often: 48 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for subarr.

If you want the quickest setup, MeTube is easier to run; subarr needs more configuration.

MeTube is growing faster right now (+289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MeTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/metube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metube.md)
- [subarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/subarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/subarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metube-vs-subarr