# metamcp vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | metamcp | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 39 in API Gateway | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 2 735 | 47 724 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 ✓ | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.

Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; metamcp needs more configuration.

metamcp is growing faster right now (+49 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [metamcp](https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metamcp-vs-text-generation-webui