# metamcp vs sglang

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | metamcp | sglang |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 39 in API Gateway | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 2 735 | 38 331 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 | +1 923 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sglang scores 86/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.

sglang ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.

If you want the quickest setup, metamcp is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.

sglang is growing faster right now (+1 923 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [metamcp](https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp.md)
- [sglang](https://selfhost.directory/project/sglang) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sglang.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metamcp-vs-sglang