# metamcp vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | metamcp | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 39 in API Gateway | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 2 735 | 93 286 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 | +58 012 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 012 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [metamcp](https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metamcp-vs-omnivoice-studio