# metamcp vs OmniRoute

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | metamcp | OmniRoute |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 39 in API Gateway | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 2 734 | 82 212 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +48 | +3 196 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.

OmniRoute ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; metamcp needs more configuration.

OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 196 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [metamcp](https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp.md)
- [OmniRoute](https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metamcp-vs-omniroute