# metamcp vs OctoBot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | metamcp | OctoBot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 39 in API Gateway | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 2 735 | 6 873 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 | +266 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OctoBot scores 69/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.

OctoBot ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.

OctoBot is growing faster right now (+266 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [metamcp](https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp.md)
- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metamcp-vs-octobot