# metamcp vs NATS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | metamcp | NATS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 39 in API Gateway | #2 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 2 735 | 20 954 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 | +192 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 | v2.14.9 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

NATS scores 80/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.

NATS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.

NATS is growing faster right now (+192 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [metamcp](https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp.md)
- [NATS](https://selfhost.directory/project/nats) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nats.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metamcp-vs-nats