MetabasevsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Metabase | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 49 911 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +513 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Clojure | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Metabase scores 83/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
If you want the quickest setup, Metabase is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Metabase is growing faster right now (+513 stars in 30 days).
Metabase details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep Metabase, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with