# Metabase vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Metabase | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 49 946 ✓ | 6 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +534 ✓ | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Clojure | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Metabase scores 83/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, Metabase is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

Metabase is growing faster right now (+534 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Metabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metabase-vs-zammad