# Metabase vs worklenz

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Metabase | worklenz |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #12 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 49 953 ✓ | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +541 ✓ | +102 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | v3.3.1 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Clojure | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Metabase scores 83/100 against 63/100 for worklenz, so it is the safer default.

Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for worklenz.

Metabase is growing faster right now (+541 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Metabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase.md)
- [worklenz](https://selfhost.directory/project/worklenz) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/worklenz.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metabase-vs-worklenz