# Metabase vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Metabase | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 49 896 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +498 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Clojure | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Metabase scores 83/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, Metabase is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Metabase is growing faster right now (+498 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Metabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metabase-vs-windows-arm