# Metabase vs wikmd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Metabase | wikmd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #5 of 8 in Documentation Management |
| GitHub stars | 49 919 ✓ | 423 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +521 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.10.7 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Clojure | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Metabase scores 83/100 against 45/100 for wikmd, so it is the safer default.

Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for wikmd.

If you want the quickest setup, wikmd is easier to run; Metabase needs more configuration.

Metabase is growing faster right now (+521 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Metabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase.md)
- [wikmd](https://selfhost.directory/project/wikmd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wikmd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metabase-vs-wikmd