Metabasevswikmd
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Metabase | wikmd | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #5 of 8 in Documentation Management |
| GitHub stars | 49 917 | 423 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +519 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | v1.10.7 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Clojure | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Metabase scores 83/100 against 45/100 for wikmd, so it is the safer default.
Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for wikmd.
If you want the quickest setup, wikmd is easier to run; Metabase needs more configuration.
Metabase is growing faster right now (+519 stars in 30 days).
Metabase details →wikmd details →
Swap a project
Keep Metabase, compare it with
Keep wikmd, compare it with