MetabasevsWiki.js
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Metabase | Wiki.js | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #2 of 31 in Wikis |
| GitHub stars | 49 919 | 29 104 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +521 | +147 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | v2.5.315 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Clojure | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Metabase scores 83/100 against 77/100 for Wiki.js, so it is the safer default.
Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Wiki.js.
If you want the quickest setup, Wiki.js is easier to run; Metabase needs more configuration.
Metabase is growing faster right now (+521 stars in 30 days).
Metabase details →Wiki.js details →
Swap a project
Keep Metabase, compare it with
Keep Wiki.js, compare it with