# Metabase vs WebSSH

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Metabase | WebSSH |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #2 of 6 in SSH |
| GitHub stars | 49 917 ✓ | 224 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +519 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | v2.6.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Clojure | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Metabase scores 83/100 against 50/100 for WebSSH, so it is the safer default.

Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for WebSSH.

Metabase is growing faster right now (+519 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Metabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase.md)
- [WebSSH](https://selfhost.directory/project/webssh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/webssh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metabase-vs-webssh