# Metabase vs Wealthfolio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Metabase | Wealthfolio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #5 of 62 in Personal Finance |
| GitHub stars | 49 946 ✓ | 9 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +534 ✓ | +238 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 21 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | v3.11.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Clojure | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Metabase scores 83/100 against 73/100 for Wealthfolio, so it is the safer default.

Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for Wealthfolio.

If you want the quickest setup, Wealthfolio is easier to run; Metabase needs more configuration.

Metabase is growing faster right now (+534 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Metabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase.md)
- [Wealthfolio](https://selfhost.directory/project/wealthfolio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wealthfolio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metabase-vs-wealthfolio