# Metabase vs Wazuh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Metabase | Wazuh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 49 904 ✓ | 17 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +506 ✓ | +493 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Clojure | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

Metabase scores 83/100 against 80/100 for Wazuh, so it is the safer default.

Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Wazuh.

If you want the quickest setup, Metabase is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Metabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase.md)
- [Wazuh](https://selfhost.directory/project/wazuh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wazuh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metabase-vs-wazuh