# Metabase vs voidaccess

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Metabase | voidaccess |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 49 917 ✓ | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +519 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 18 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Clojure | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Metabase scores 83/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.

Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for voidaccess.

If you want the quickest setup, Metabase is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.

Metabase is growing faster right now (+519 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Metabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase.md)
- [voidaccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metabase-vs-voidaccess