MetabasevsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Metabase | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 49 904 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +506 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Clojure | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Metabase scores 83/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
Metabase is growing faster right now (+506 stars in 30 days).
Metabase details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep Metabase, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with