# Metabase vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Metabase | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 49 919 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +507 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Clojure | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Metabase scores 83/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

Metabase is growing faster right now (+507 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Metabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metabase-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api