# Metabase vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Metabase | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 49 896 ✓ | 39 752 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +498 | +771 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Clojure | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 83/100 for Metabase, so it is the safer default.

Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.

If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Metabase needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Metabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metabase-vs-umami