# Metabase vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Metabase | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 49 919 | 117 928 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +521 | +5 569 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Clojure | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 83/100 for Metabase, so it is the safer default.

Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 569 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Metabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metabase-vs-tradingagents