# Metabase vs Torollo

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Metabase | Torollo |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #15 of 30 in Education |
| GitHub stars | 49 940 ✓ | 449 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +528 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.5 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Clojure | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Metabase scores 83/100 against 47/100 for Torollo, so it is the safer default.

Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Torollo.

If you want the quickest setup, Torollo is easier to run; Metabase needs more configuration.

Metabase is growing faster right now (+528 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Metabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metabase.md)
- [Torollo](https://selfhost.directory/project/torollo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/torollo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/metabase-vs-torollo