Metabasevstimesheet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Metabase | timesheet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 38/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #10 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 49 953 | 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +541 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Clojure | Vue |
Which one should you pick?
Metabase scores 83/100 against 38/100 for timesheet, so it is the safer default.
Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for timesheet.
Metabase is growing faster right now (+541 stars in 30 days).
Metabase details →timesheet details →
Swap a project
Keep Metabase, compare it with
Keep timesheet, compare it with