MetabasevsProject OSRM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Metabase | Project OSRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 49 904 | 8 179 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +506 | +76 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 16 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Clojure | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
Metabase scores 83/100 against 69/100 for Project OSRM, so it is the safer default.
Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Project OSRM.
If you want the quickest setup, Metabase is easier to run; Project OSRM needs more configuration.
Metabase is growing faster right now (+506 stars in 30 days).
Metabase details →Project OSRM details →
Swap a project
Keep Metabase, compare it with
Keep Project OSRM, compare it with