# meshview vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | meshview | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #29 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 148 | 56 874 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +145 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | 3.0.9 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 48/100 for meshview, so it is the safer default.

meshview ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; meshview needs more configuration.

Typst is growing faster right now (+145 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [meshview](https://selfhost.directory/project/meshview) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/meshview.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/meshview-vs-typst