# meshping vs qdrant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | meshping | qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #31 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 170 | 35 301 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +498 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 47/100 for meshping, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for meshping.

If you want the quickest setup, meshping is easier to run; qdrant needs more configuration.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+498 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [meshping](https://selfhost.directory/project/meshping) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/meshping.md)
- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/meshping-vs-qdrant