# meshping vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | meshping | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #31 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 170 | 393 322 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 898 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 47/100 for meshping, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for meshping.

If you want the quickest setup, meshping is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 898 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [meshping](https://selfhost.directory/project/meshping) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/meshping.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/meshping-vs-openclaw