# meshping vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted [Network Monitoring projects](https://selfhost.directory/network-monitoring), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | meshping | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #31 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 170 | 46 459 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 324 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 47/100 for meshping, so it is the safer default.

mitmproxy ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for meshping.

If you want the quickest setup, meshping is easier to run; mitmproxy needs more configuration.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 324 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [meshping](https://selfhost.directory/project/meshping) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/meshping.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/meshping-vs-mitmproxy