MeshCentralvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MeshCentral | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 23 in Remote Access | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 7 537 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +254 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 6 |
| Latest release | 1.3.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
MeshCentral scores 74/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
MeshCentral ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, MeshCentral is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
MeshCentral is growing faster right now (+254 stars in 30 days).
MeshCentral details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep MeshCentral, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with