MeshCentralvsTwenty
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MeshCentral | Twenty | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 23 in Remote Access | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 7 535 | 60 023 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +257 | +2 635 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 10 |
| Latest release | 1.3.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Twenty scores 84/100 against 74/100 for MeshCentral, so it is the safer default.
MeshCentral ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Twenty.
If you want the quickest setup, MeshCentral is easier to run; Twenty needs more configuration.
Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 635 stars in 30 days).
MeshCentral details →Twenty details →
Swap a project
Keep MeshCentral, compare it with
Keep Twenty, compare it with