MeshCentralvsryot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MeshCentral | ryot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 23 in Remote Access | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 7 540 | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +257 | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 2 |
| Latest release | 1.3.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
MeshCentral scores 74/100 against 63/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.
MeshCentral ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
If you want the quickest setup, MeshCentral is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.
MeshCentral is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).
MeshCentral details →ryot details →
Swap a project
Keep MeshCentral, compare it with
Keep ryot, compare it with