# MeshCentral vs polar

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MeshCentral | polar |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 23 in Remote Access | #1 of 13 in Billing |
| GitHub stars | 7 535 | 10 436 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +252 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 1.3.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | @polar-sh/cli@3.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MeshCentral scores 74/100 against 71/100 for polar, so it is the safer default.

MeshCentral ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for polar.

If you want the quickest setup, MeshCentral is easier to run; polar needs more configuration.

## Details

- [MeshCentral](https://selfhost.directory/project/meshcentral) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/meshcentral.md)
- [polar](https://selfhost.directory/project/polar) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/polar.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/meshcentral-vs-polar