# memory-os vs supermemory

> Two self-hosted [Mem0 alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/mem0), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | memory-os | supermemory |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #167 of 209 in AI Agents | #19 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 1 384 | 31 447 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +599 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | server-v0.0.9 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supermemory scores 73/100 against 40/100 for memory-os, so it is the safer default.

supermemory ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for memory-os.

If you want the quickest setup, supermemory is easier to run; memory-os needs more configuration.

supermemory is growing faster right now (+599 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [memory-os](https://selfhost.directory/project/memory-os) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/memory-os.md)
- [supermemory](https://selfhost.directory/project/supermemory) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supermemory.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/memory-os-vs-supermemory