# mem0 vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | mem0 | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 166 in Developer Tools | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 68 041 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 082 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 82 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | ts-v3.3.1 · 25 Sept 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mem0 scores 86/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

mem0 ships more often: 82 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, mem0 is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

mem0 is growing faster right now (+2 082 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [mem0](https://selfhost.directory/project/mem0) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mem0.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mem0-vs-tube-archivist