# MedusaJs vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MedusaJs | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 36 989 ✓ | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +538 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+538 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MedusaJs](https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/medusajs-vs-zammad