# MedusaJs vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MedusaJs | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 36 991 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +540 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+540 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MedusaJs](https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/medusajs-vs-windows-arm