MedusaJsvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MedusaJs | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 36 997 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +546 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.
MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+546 stars in 30 days).
MedusaJs details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with