MedusaJsvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MedusaJs | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 36 990 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +539 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+539 stars in 30 days).
MedusaJs details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with