MedusaJsvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MedusaJs | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 36 989 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +538 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.
MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+538 stars in 30 days).
MedusaJs details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with