# MedusaJs vs unopim

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MedusaJs | unopim |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 36 987 ✓ | 11 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +547 ✓ | +48 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 69/100 for unopim, so it is the safer default.

MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for unopim.

If you want the quickest setup, unopim is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.

MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+547 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MedusaJs](https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs.md)
- [unopim](https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/medusajs-vs-unopim