# MedusaJs vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MedusaJs | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 36 997 | 114 295 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +546 | +3 547 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 83/100 for MedusaJs, so it is the safer default.

MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 547 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MedusaJs](https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/medusajs-vs-supabase