# MedusaJs vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MedusaJs | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 36 990 | 95 299 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +539 | +2 337 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 83/100 for MedusaJs, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MedusaJs.

If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 337 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MedusaJs](https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/medusajs-vs-stirling-pdf