# MedusaJs vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MedusaJs | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 36 989 ✓ | 29 390 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +538 ✓ | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 78/100 for SRS, so it is the safer default.

MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for SRS.

If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.

MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+538 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MedusaJs](https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/medusajs-vs-srs