# MedusaJs vs SpacetimeDB

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MedusaJs | SpacetimeDB |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 37 004 ✓ | 25 433 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +553 ✓ | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 75/100 for SpacetimeDB, so it is the safer default.

MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for SpacetimeDB.

If you want the quickest setup, SpacetimeDB is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.

MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+553 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MedusaJs](https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs.md)
- [SpacetimeDB](https://selfhost.directory/project/spacetimedb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spacetimedb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/medusajs-vs-spacetimedb