# MedusaJs vs Apache SkyWalking

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MedusaJs | Apache SkyWalking |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 36 997 ✓ | 24 978 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +546 ✓ | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 76/100 for Apache SkyWalking, so it is the safer default.

MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Apache SkyWalking.

MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+546 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MedusaJs](https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs.md)
- [Apache SkyWalking](https://selfhost.directory/project/skywalking) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/skywalking.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/medusajs-vs-skywalking